PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFVX vs. EHSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFVX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than EHSTX's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX has outperformed EHSTX with an annualized return of 12.13%, while EHSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.


EIFVX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.36%
YTD
13.73%
6M
14.31%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
12.13%

EHSTX

1D
0.64%
1M
3.92%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.35%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFVX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund
13.73%10.89%12.44%8.48%-3.31%23.71%2.23%37.25%-6.15%20.40%
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
12.24%12.11%11.25%7.93%-2.80%24.25%2.29%30.84%-6.96%14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFVX and EHSTX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.98

The correlation between EIFVX and EHSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFVX vs. EHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFVX
EIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EHSTX
EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFVXEHSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

2.17

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

3.05

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.92

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.38

11.82

-0.44

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the EHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFVX and EHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIFVXEHSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.17

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.63

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.53

+0.20

Drawdowns

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFVX drawdown since its inception was -40.64%, smaller than the maximum EHSTX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFVX and EHSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFVXEHSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.64%

-53.47%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-8.29%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.87%

-16.44%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-16.44%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-39.30%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.53%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-7.40%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.04%

+0.37%

Volatility

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) at 3.37%. This indicates that EIFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFVXEHSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.37%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

8.31%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

11.16%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

14.74%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

17.28%

+0.76%

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIFVX vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison

EIFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than EHSTX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
5.42%6.12%4.03%2.93%4.25%7.32%1.94%2.76%10.94%5.88%1.33%11.02%
EIFVX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund
4.91%5.58%6.99%2.92%4.13%9.92%3.05%7.05%17.26%3.57%2.86%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EIFVX and EHSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EIFVX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to EHSTX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFVX dropped -40.64% vs EHSTX's -53.47%.

EIFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFVX and EHSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer