PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFVX vs. EGRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFVX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than EGRIX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX has outperformed EGRIX with an annualized return of 12.04%, while EGRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.54% annualized return.


EIFVX

1D
-0.97%
1M
3.16%
YTD
12.82%
6M
14.54%
1Y
26.31%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
12.04%

EGRIX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.73%
YTD
6.50%
6M
8.23%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
6.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFVX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund
12.82%10.89%12.44%8.48%-3.31%23.71%2.23%37.25%-6.15%20.40%
EGRIX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund
6.50%20.36%9.50%8.37%-1.94%3.66%4.71%14.80%-8.34%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFVX and EGRIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFVX vs. EGRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFVX
EIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EGRIX
EGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFVXEGRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

5.51

-3.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

7.84

-4.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.48

-1.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

5.71

-3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.01

20.69

-9.68

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the EGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFVX and EGRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIFVXEGRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

5.51

-3.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

2.16

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

1.65

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.32

-0.60

Drawdowns

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFVX drawdown since its inception was -40.64%, which is greater than EGRIX's maximum drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFVX and EGRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFVXEGRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.64%

-14.17%

-26.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-3.37%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.87%

-3.37%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-10.18%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-14.17%

-26.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.24%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-1.84%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

0.93%

+1.48%

Volatility

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) at 0.93%. This indicates that EIFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFVXEGRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

0.93%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

3.21%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

3.55%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

4.03%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

3.97%

+14.07%

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EGRIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIFVX vs. EGRIX - Dividend Comparison

EIFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than EGRIX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EGRIX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund
6.25%6.65%6.00%3.40%4.82%4.89%5.82%4.15%0.06%3.22%1.78%6.67%
EIFVX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund
4.95%5.58%6.99%2.92%4.13%9.92%3.05%7.05%17.26%3.57%2.86%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIFVX and EGRIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIFVX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to EGRIX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFVX dropped -40.64% vs EGRIX's -14.17%.

EGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.51 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFVX and EGRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer