EIRAX vs. E
EIRAX (Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund) is Tactical Allocation fund managed by Eaton Vance, while E (Eni S.p.A.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EIRAX returned 6.44%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for E. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EIRAX vs. E - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRAX achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than E's 31.38% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRAX has underperformed E with an annualized return of 6.44%, while E has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.
EIRAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
E
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- 31.38%
- 6M
- 31.79%
- 1Y
- 59.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
EIRAX vs. E - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | 7.75% | 12.89% | 7.68% | 6.80% | -14.73% | 7.22% | 9.83% | 16.28% | -7.47% | 15.02% |
E Eni S.p.A. | 31.38% | 48.40% | -13.95% | 26.73% | 10.92% | 43.12% | -28.73% | 4.29% | -0.98% | 7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRAX and E is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EIRAX and E has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIRAX vs. E — Risk / Return Rank
EIRAX
E
EIRAX vs. E - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIRAX | E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 4.13 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | 17.38 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIRAX vs. E - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRAX drawdown since its inception was -19.85%, smaller than the maximum E drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRAX and E.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRAX | E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -70.53% | +50.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -14.47% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.71% | -20.13% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -33.71% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -61.59% | +41.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -14.47% | +14.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -23.06% | +19.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.43% | -1.70% |
Volatility
EIRAX vs. E - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) is 3.59%, while Eni S.p.A. (E) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that EIRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIRAX | E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 6.95% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 20.13% | -12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 23.33% | -14.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.91% | 25.04% | -16.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 28.08% | -18.94% |
Dividends
EIRAX vs. E - Dividend Comparison
EIRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than E's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Eni S.p.A. | 4.94% | 5.88% | 7.69% | 5.74% | 6.38% | 5.79% | 5.91% | 6.11% | 5.15% | 3.96% | 3.98% | 5.14% |
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | 2.60% | 2.80% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 1.11% | 5.68% | 3.13% | 7.42% | 2.98% | 2.35% | 0.73% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIRAX and E have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
E has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to EIRAX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRAX dropped -19.85% vs E's -70.53%.
E currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIRAX and E
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer