EHY vs. BATT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT).

EHY and BATT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EHY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Oct 8, 2025. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.

Performance

EHY vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EHY vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-27.04%	-25.71%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	7.90%	5.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -27.04% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 7.90% return.

EHY

• 1D: 4.02%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: -27.04%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: 4.20%
• 1M: -8.43%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 81.61%
• 3Y*: 7.85%
• 5Y*: 1.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHY vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

EHY

Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF

Return for Risk

EHY vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHY vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EHY	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.16	-0.05	-1.11

Correlation

The correlation between EHY and BATT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EHY vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.96%, more than BATT's 1.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	28.96%	8.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.72%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%

Drawdowns

EHY vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHY	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.48%	-69.38%	+17.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.80%	-16.31%	-29.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.89%	-35.41%	+5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHY	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.24%	32.37%	+30.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.24%	29.25%	+33.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.24%	30.55%	+32.69%