EHY vs. EZPZ
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EHY is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
EHY vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -38.15% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
EHY
- 1D
- -6.90%
- 1M
- -26.11%
- YTD
- -38.15%
- 6M
- -36.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EHY vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -38.15% | -25.71% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -29.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and EZPZ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
EZPZ
EHY vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHY | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | -0.61 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
EHY vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.05% | -52.38% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.05% | -51.59% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -21.72% | -11.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.36% | 46.83% | +11.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.36% | 47.65% | +10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.36% | 47.65% | +10.71% |
EHY vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.29%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 48.29% | 8.87% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EHY and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 48.29%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for EHY and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer