EHSTX vs. NPRTX
EHSTX (Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund) and NPRTX (Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX returned 11.40%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for NPRTX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EHSTX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NPRTX.
Performance
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHSTX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than NPRTX's 20.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has underperformed NPRTX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while NPRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.
EHSTX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
NPRTX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 6M
- 19.37%
- 1Y
- 38.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 13.72% | 12.11% | 11.25% | 7.93% | -2.80% | 24.25% | 2.29% | 30.84% | -6.96% | 14.79% |
NPRTX Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund | 20.12% | 20.69% | 10.92% | -1.76% | -1.25% | 28.12% | 14.44% | 23.96% | -1.23% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHSTX and NPRTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1980 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EHSTX and NPRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHSTX vs. NPRTX — Risk / Return Rank
EHSTX
NPRTX
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHSTX | NPRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.61 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 5.57 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 22.66 | -10.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum NPRTX drawdown of -66.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and NPRTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHSTX | NPRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -66.25% | +12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -7.03% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -13.79% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -19.82% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -39.01% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.33% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.40% | -9.25% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.72% | +0.34% |
Volatility
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHSTX | NPRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.22% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 9.48% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 11.73% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 14.11% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 17.60% | -0.29% |
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NPRTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHSTX vs. NPRTX - Dividend Comparison
EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, which matches NPRTX's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 5.32% | 6.12% | 4.03% | 2.93% | 4.25% | 7.32% | 1.94% | 2.76% | 10.94% | 5.88% | 1.33% | 11.02% |
NPRTX Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund | 5.35% | 6.42% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.56% | 5.04% | 1.60% | 3.87% | 14.44% | 8.55% | 3.58% | 9.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EHSTX and NPRTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NPRTX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to EHSTX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHSTX dropped -53.47% vs NPRTX's -66.25%.
NPRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EHSTX and NPRTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer