NPRTX vs. DAGVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NPRTX (Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund) and DAGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NPRTX returned 14.38%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for DAGVX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NPRTX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for DAGVX.

Performance

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPRTX achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than DAGVX's 15.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NPRTX having a 14.38% annualized return and DAGVX not far behind at 14.11%.

NPRTX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 20.12%
• 6M: 19.37%
• 1Y: 38.09%
• 3Y*: 17.44%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 14.38%

DAGVX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 29.34%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: 14.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NPRTX Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund	20.12%	20.69%	10.92%	-1.76%	-1.25%	28.12%	14.44%	23.96%	-1.23%	13.45%
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	15.61%	18.20%	14.16%	12.54%	1.43%	30.90%	3.66%	26.74%	-10.76%	14.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NPRTX and DAGVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1995	0.91

The correlation between NPRTX and DAGVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NPRTX vs. DAGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPRTX

NPRTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
NPRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NPRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
NPRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
NPRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NPRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

DAGVX

DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 83
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NPRTX	DAGVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	2.45	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.60	3.40	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.43	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.57	4.52	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.66	16.55	+6.11

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPRTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the DAGVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPRTX and DAGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPRTX drawdown since its inception was -66.25%, which is greater than DAGVX's maximum drawdown of -55.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPRTX and DAGVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NPRTX	DAGVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.25%	-55.04%	-11.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.03%	-6.69%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.79%	-16.96%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.82%	-16.96%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.01%	-42.62%	+3.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.28%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-7.64%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.82%	-0.10%

Volatility

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NPRTX	DAGVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	4.24%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	9.56%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	12.35%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	15.59%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	18.85%	-1.25%

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPRTX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DAGVX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

NPRTX vs. DAGVX - Dividend Comparison

NPRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than DAGVX's 5.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	5.78%	6.69%	6.85%	5.09%	7.96%	21.64%	2.64%	3.29%	17.81%	10.71%	2.72%	15.78%
NPRTX Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund	5.35%	6.42%	2.19%	2.45%	1.56%	5.04%	1.60%	3.87%	14.44%	8.55%	3.58%	9.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NPRTX and DAGVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, NPRTX and DAGVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NPRTX or DAGVX?

DAGVX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to NPRTX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPRTX dropped -66.25% vs DAGVX's -55.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NPRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.