EHSTX vs. EIRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX).
EHSTX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 23, 1931. EIRAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 29, 2011.
Performance
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 0.60% | 12.11% | 11.25% | 7.93% | -2.80% | 24.25% | 2.29% | 30.84% | -6.96% | 14.79% |
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | -1.78% | 12.89% | 7.68% | 6.80% | -14.73% | 7.22% | 9.83% | 16.28% | -7.47% | 15.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHSTX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than EIRAX's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has outperformed EIRAX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while EIRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.51% annualized return.
EHSTX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
EIRAX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EIRAX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EHSTX vs. EIRAX — Risk / Return Rank
EHSTX
EIRAX
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHSTX | EIRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.11 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.63 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.46 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 6.43 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHSTX | EIRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.11 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.30 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EHSTX and EIRAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Dividend Comparison
EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than EIRAX's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 6.05% | 6.12% | 4.03% | 2.93% | 4.25% | 7.32% | 1.94% | 2.76% | 10.94% | 5.88% | 1.33% | 11.02% |
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | 2.85% | 2.80% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 1.11% | 5.68% | 3.13% | 7.42% | 2.98% | 2.35% | 0.73% | 1.59% |
Drawdowns
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than EIRAX's maximum drawdown of -19.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and EIRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHSTX | EIRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -19.85% | -33.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -7.73% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -19.85% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -19.85% | -19.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -5.79% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -3.86% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 1.75% | +1.11% |
Volatility
EHSTX vs. EIRAX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EHSTX | EIRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.63% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 6.91% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 10.04% | +5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 8.69% | +6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 9.06% | +8.21% |