EGPT vs. NLR
EGPT (VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGPT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MVIS Egypt Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGPT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
EGPT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EGPT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- -4.59%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 35.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
EGPT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -11.22% | 27.27% | -24.66% | 11.31% | -11.53% | 6.80% | -13.88% | 24.83% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 6.14% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGPT and NLR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2010 | 0.21 |
The correlation between EGPT and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EGPT vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EGPT
NLR
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
EGPT
NLR
-
Basic Materials
EGPT
NLR
-
Financial Services
EGPT
NLR
-
Consumer Defensive
EGPT
NLR
-
Technology
EGPT
NLR
Industrials
EGPT
NLR
Communication Services
EGPT
NLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
EGPT
NLR
-
Healthcare
EGPT
NLR
-
Energy
EGPT
NLR
Utilities
EGPT
-
NLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGPT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
EGPT
NLR
EGPT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGPT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.18 | — |
Drawdowns
EGPT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGPT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -65.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -19.80% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.72% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.61% | — |
Volatility
EGPT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGPT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 42.32% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 29.24% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.02% | — |
EGPT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGPT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGPT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 6.02% | 1.32% | 2.45% | 2.50% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.77% | 1.60% | 1.59% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGPT and NLR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.
EGPT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. EGPT tracks MVIS Egypt Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EGPT and 0.56% for NLR.
Find the right allocation for EGPT and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer