EGPT vs. EFA
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA).
EGPT and EFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EGPT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Egypt Index. It was launched on Feb 16, 2010. EFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Aug 14, 2001. Both EGPT and EFA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EGPT or EFA.
Key characteristics
| EGPT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -11.22% | 2.55% |
| 1Y Return | -95.86% | 8.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -100.00% | 2.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -100.00% | 6.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -99.82% | 4.24% |
| Daily Std Dev | 189.29% | 12.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.84% | -61.04% |
| Current Drawdown | -97.79% | -3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGPT and EFA is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
EGPT vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EGPT achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, EGPT has underperformed EFA with an annualized return of -99.82%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EGPT vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGPT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EGPT vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EGPT vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
EGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than EFA's 2.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 6.94% | 6.02% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.32% | 0.15% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 2.90% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% | 3.72% | 2.54% |
Drawdowns
EGPT vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGPT drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than EFA's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGPT and EFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EGPT vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that EGPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.