EGPT vs. GDXJ
EGPT (VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGPT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MVIS Egypt Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGPT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EGPT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 65.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -11.22% | 27.27% | -24.66% | 11.31% | -11.53% | 6.80% | -13.88% | 24.83% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -2.55% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGPT and GDXJ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2010 | 0.12 |
The correlation between EGPT and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EGPT
GDXJ
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
EGPT
GDXJ
Financial Services
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Technology
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Industrials
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Energy
EGPT
GDXJ
-
Utilities
EGPT
-
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGPT vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
EGPT
GDXJ
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGPT | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.06 | — |
Drawdowns
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGPT | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -88.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -29.01% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -60.50% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.19% | — |
Volatility
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGPT | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 49.79% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 41.10% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 44.06% | — |
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGPT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGPT vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 6.02% | 1.32% | 2.45% | 2.50% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.77% | 1.60% | 1.59% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.39% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGPT and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.
EGPT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. EGPT tracks MVIS Egypt Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EGPT and 0.52% for GDXJ.
Find the right allocation for EGPT and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer