PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGGS vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGGS vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than CRSH's 3.70% return.


EGGS

1D
-0.13%
1M
6.43%
YTD
16.66%
6M
12.76%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRSH

1D
0.54%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
3.70%
6M
5.11%
1Y
-18.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
16.66%14.41%-1.96%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
3.70%-13.40%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and CRSH is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024

-0.51

The correlation between EGGS and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.42 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGGS vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS
EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGGSCRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.94

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

-0.57

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

-0.90

+4.00

EGGS vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and CRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGGSCRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

-0.52

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

-0.70

+1.56

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and CRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGGSCRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-63.68%

+45.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

-33.45%

+15.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-59.20%

+58.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-43.15%

+37.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

21.20%

-13.24%

Volatility

EGGS vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is 8.78%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that EGGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGGSCRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

10.19%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.13%

22.67%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

36.71%

-13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.35%

47.46%

-23.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

47.46%

-23.11%

EGGS vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGGS vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.56%, less than CRSH's 97.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
97.46%138.78%94.25%
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
15.56%14.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGGS and CRSH have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to EGGS (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs CRSH's -63.68%.

On 1-year performance, EGGS leads with 24.65% vs -18.98% for CRSH. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EGGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EGGS has performed better with a 24.65% return vs -18.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 97.46%, compared with 15.56% for EGGS.

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.99% for CRSH.

EGGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGGS and CRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer