EGGS vs. CRSH
EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 24.65% vs -18.98% for CRSH. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
EGGS vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than CRSH's 3.70% return.
EGGS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- -18.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGS vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 16.66% | 14.41% | -1.96% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.70% | -13.40% | 3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGS and CRSH is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | -0.51 |
The correlation between EGGS and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.42 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGS vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
EGGS
CRSH
EGGS vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGGS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.94 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.57 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | -0.90 | +4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGGS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | -0.52 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | -0.70 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
EGGS vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -63.68% | +45.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -33.45% | +15.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -59.20% | +58.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -43.15% | +37.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 21.20% | -13.24% |
Volatility
EGGS vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is 8.78%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that EGGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 10.19% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.13% | 22.67% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 36.71% | -13.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 47.46% | -23.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 47.46% | -23.11% |
EGGS vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGS vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.56%, less than CRSH's 97.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 97.46% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 15.56% | 14.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGS and CRSH have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to EGGS (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, EGGS leads with 24.65% vs -18.98% for CRSH. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EGGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGS has performed better with a 24.65% return vs -18.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 97.46%, compared with 15.56% for EGGS.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.99% for CRSH.
EGGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGS and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer