PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFV vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.72% return.


EFV

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
8.07%
6M
12.00%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
9.94%

QQQM

1D
1.54%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.72%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
8.07%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%15.85%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
16.72%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and QQQM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.53

The correlation between EFV and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFV
QQQM

Financial Services

37.3%
0.2%

Industrials

9.6%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
7.7%

Healthcare

7.4%
4.2%

Energy

6.8%
0.6%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
12.3%

Utilities

5.7%
1.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
15.8%

Technology

3.2%
53.8%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.1%

Financial Services

EFV
37.3%
QQQM
0.2%

Industrials

EFV
9.6%
QQQM
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
9.5%
QQQM
7.7%

Healthcare

EFV
7.4%
QQQM
4.2%

Energy

EFV
6.8%
QQQM
0.6%

Basic Materials

EFV
6.5%
QQQM
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
6.0%
QQQM
12.3%

Utilities

EFV
5.7%
QQQM
1.4%

Communication Services

EFV
4.4%
QQQM
15.8%

Technology

EFV
3.2%
QQQM
53.8%

Real Estate

EFV
2.7%
QQQM
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFVQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.01

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

11.44

-2.65

EFV vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFVQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.16

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.77

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.80

-0.54

Drawdowns

EFV vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-35.04%

-28.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-11.96%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-22.70%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-35.04%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

-4.04%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-8.24%

-6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.14%

-0.21%

Volatility

EFV vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 3.81%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFVQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

6.83%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

13.15%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

16.70%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

22.34%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

22.20%

-4.33%

EFV vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFV vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than QQQM's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.85%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.43%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFV and QQQM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to EFV (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 17.06% vs 11.92% for EFV. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 17.06% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.43% for QQQM.

EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer