EFU vs. QTAP
EFU (ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFU is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFU returned -15.08%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for QTAP. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. EFU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
EFU vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFU achieves a -16.12% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.67% return.
EFU
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- -16.12%
- 6M
- -19.44%
- 1Y
- -30.25%
- 3Y*
- -23.88%
- 5Y*
- -15.08%
- 10Y*
- -19.60%
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EFU vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | -16.12% | -41.07% | -1.04% | -25.36% | 24.26% | -14.95% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.67% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFU and QTAP is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | -0.64 |
The correlation between EFU and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFU vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
EFU
QTAP
EFU vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 2.23 | -1.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 15.20 | -16.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 80.04 | -81.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 4.62 | -5.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.73 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.75 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
EFU vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -29.44% | -69.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.19% | -1.69% | -32.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.29% | -13.03% | -51.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.42% | -29.44% | -45.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -0.10% | -99.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.13% | -5.04% | -82.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.14% | 0.32% | +19.82% |
Volatility
EFU vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that EFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 1.33% | +8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.06% | 3.97% | +22.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.91% | 5.56% | +25.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 18.89% | +14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 18.77% | +15.43% |
EFU vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFU vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | 5.38% | 5.57% | 3.87% | 6.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFU and QTAP have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFU has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFU dropped -99.36% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 13.78% vs -15.08% for EFU. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 13.78% return vs -15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFU.
EFU has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFU and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFU and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer