EFU vs. GGLL
EFU (ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE) and GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EFU tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-200%) while GGLL tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFU returned -23.88%/yr vs 65.97%/yr for GGLL. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. EFU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GGLL.
Performance
EFU vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFU achieves a -16.12% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 22.24% return.
EFU
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- -16.12%
- 6M
- -19.44%
- 1Y
- -30.25%
- 3Y*
- -23.88%
- 5Y*
- -15.08%
- 10Y*
- -19.60%
GGLL
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -13.22%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 293.20%
- 3Y*
- 65.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFU vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | -16.12% | -41.07% | -1.04% | -25.36% | -16.98% |
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 22.24% | 123.07% | 48.88% | 81.20% | -30.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFU and GGLL is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFU vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank
EFU
GGLL
EFU vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFU | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | 5.07 | -6.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | 4.96 | -6.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.60 | -0.75 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 7.69 | -8.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 26.53 | -28.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFU | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 5.07 | -6.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.99 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
EFU vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and GGLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFU | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -52.81% | -46.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.19% | -38.39% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.29% | -52.81% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -21.02% | -78.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.13% | -15.17% | -71.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.14% | 11.11% | +9.03% |
Volatility
EFU vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is 10.10%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that EFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFU | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 16.60% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.06% | 40.70% | -14.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.91% | 58.40% | -27.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 56.03% | -22.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 56.03% | -21.83% |
EFU vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFU vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison
EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than GGLL's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | 5.38% | 5.57% | 3.87% | 6.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 3.73% | 4.16% | 3.29% | 2.05% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFU and GGLL have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGLL has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to EFU (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFU dropped -99.36% vs GGLL's -52.81%.
On 3-year performance, GGLL leads with 65.97% vs -23.88% for EFU. On fees, EFU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EFU has been the lower-risk option at 10.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 65.97% return vs -23.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.
EFU has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 3.73% for GGLL.
EFU tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-200%), while GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFU and 1.05% for GGLL.
GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFU and GGLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer