EFU vs. EEV
EFU (ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE) and EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EFU tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-200%) while EEV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFU returned -19.72%/yr vs -21.99%/yr for EEV. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EFU vs. EEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFU achieves a -20.84% return, which is significantly higher than EEV's -35.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EFU has outperformed EEV with an annualized return of -19.72%, while EEV has yielded a comparatively lower -21.99% annualized return.
EFU
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- YTD
- -20.84%
- 1Y
- -35.13%
- 3Y*
- -24.16%
- 5Y*
- -16.37%
- 10Y*
- -19.72%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.07%
EEV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- 6M
- -24.14%
- YTD
- -35.13%
- 1Y
- -50.21%
- 3Y*
- -29.41%
- 5Y*
- -16.05%
- 10Y*
- -21.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $291.03K | $257.03K | $533.45K | |
| $22.02K | $35.41K | $55.57K |
EFU vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | -20.84% | -41.07% | -1.04% | -25.36% | 24.26% | -24.58% | -35.54% | -32.71% | 32.32% | -36.87% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -35.13% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFU and EEV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2007 | 0.79 |
The correlation between EFU and EEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFU vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank
EFU
EEV
EFU vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFU | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.85 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | -1.42 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFU vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.39%, roughly equal to the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and EEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFU | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.39% | -99.88% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.76% | -58.51% | +22.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.69% | -77.51% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.39% | -81.14% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.39% | -93.39% | +4.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.38% | -99.86% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.21% | -93.04% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.95% | 35.01% | -12.06% |
Volatility
EFU vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is 9.53%, while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a volatility of 19.23%. This indicates that EFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFU | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.53% | 19.23% | -9.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.80% | 45.21% | -16.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.57% | 49.49% | -16.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 40.12% | -6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 41.76% | -8.15% |
EFU vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EFU and EEV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EFU vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison
EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than EEV's 7.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.22% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | 5.18% | 5.57% | 3.87% | 6.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFU and EEV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEV has higher volatility (19.23%) compared to EFU (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFU dropped -99.39% vs EEV's -99.88%.
On 10-year performance, EFU leads with -19.72% vs -21.99% for EEV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFU has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFU has performed better with a -19.72% return vs -21.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFU and EEV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 5.18% for EFU.
EFU tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-200%), while EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%).
EEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.00 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFU and EEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer