EFU vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EFU (ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EFU tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-200%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EFU returned -30.37% vs 171.19% for NRGU. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EFU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFU achieves a -17.12% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 125.94% return.

EFU

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -5.46%
• YTD: -17.12%
• 6M: -20.10%
• 1Y: -30.37%
• 3Y*: -24.51%
• 5Y*: -15.28%
• 10Y*: -19.70%

NRGU

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 125.94%
• 6M: 93.16%
• 1Y: 171.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE	-17.12%	-31.33%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	125.94%	-33.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EFU and NRGU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.01

The correlation between EFU and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EFU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFU

EFU Risk / Return Rank: 2
EFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EFU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EFU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 64
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	2.31	-3.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	2.55	-3.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.32	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	4.31	-5.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.50	10.74	-12.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFU and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99	2.31	-3.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.44	0.43	-0.87

Drawdowns

EFU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFU	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.36%	-57.50%	-41.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.19%	-39.95%	+5.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.35%	-22.07%	-77.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.13%	-25.41%	-61.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.24%	16.01%	+4.23%

Volatility

EFU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is 9.80%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 31.62%. This indicates that EFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFU	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.80%	31.62%	-21.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.08%	61.19%	-35.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.88%	75.02%	-44.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.33%	89.03%	-55.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.19%	89.03%	-54.84%

EFU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFU and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EFU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE	5.45%	5.57%	3.87%	6.41%	1.47%	0.00%	0.06%	0.95%	0.17%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFU and NRGU in my portfolio?

EFU and NRGU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFU or NRGU?

NRGU has higher volatility (31.62%) compared to EFU (9.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFU dropped -99.36% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, EFU or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 171.19% vs -30.37% for EFU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFU has been the lower-risk option at 9.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFU or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 171.19% return vs -30.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFU or NRGU?

EFU and NRGU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFU or NRGU?

EFU has the higher dividend yield at 5.45%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between EFU and NRGU?

EFU tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-200%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.