PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFU vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFU achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.


EFU

1D
-3.09%
1M
8.38%
YTD
-5.85%
6M
-11.25%
1Y
-35.75%
3Y*
-21.50%
5Y*
-15.41%
10Y*
-19.28%

NRGU

1D
-10.75%
1M
24.81%
YTD
139.49%
6M
107.68%
1Y
69.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFU and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

EFU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFU
EFU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
EFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFUNRGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.01

0.79

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.46

1.48

-2.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.21

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

1.29

-1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

2.64

-3.52

EFU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFU Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFU and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFUNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.01

0.79

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

0.61

-1.04

Correlation

The correlation between EFU and NRGU is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EFU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EFU
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
4.80%5.57%3.87%6.41%1.47%0.00%0.06%0.95%0.17%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and NRGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFUNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.35%

-57.50%

-41.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

-55.24%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.27%

-17.40%

-81.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.02%

-25.38%

-61.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.37%

27.12%

+13.25%

Volatility

EFU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is 15.09%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.31%. This indicates that EFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFUNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.09%

23.31%

-8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.36%

50.27%

-27.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.60%

88.18%

-52.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.89%

87.12%

-54.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.98%

87.12%

-53.14%