EFU vs. LINT
EFU (ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. EFU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
EFU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFU achieves a -15.95% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.
EFU
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -15.95%
- 6M
- -15.28%
- 1Y
- -31.13%
- 3Y*
- -24.16%
- 5Y*
- -15.34%
- 10Y*
- -20.39%
LINT
- 1D
- -12.86%
- 1M
- 11.99%
- YTD
- 744.89%
- 6M
- 773.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | -15.95% | -9.03% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 744.89% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFU and LINT is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
EFU
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.37% | -49.54% | -49.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -12.86% | -86.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.14% | -20.48% | -66.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.36% | — | — |
Volatility
EFU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.36% | 168.83% | -136.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 168.83% | -135.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 168.83% | -135.17% |
EFU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | 5.37% | 5.57% | 3.87% | 6.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.10% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFU and LINT have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EFU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
EFU has the higher dividend yield at 5.37%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFU and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for EFU and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer