EFR.TO vs. QBTS
EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, EFR.TO returned 34.35%/yr vs 127.04%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EFR.TO is traded in CAD, while QBTS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QBTS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -8.72% return.
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -24.06%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 187.96%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- 50.63%
- 3Y*
- 127.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 5.89% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -7.30% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -8.72% | 197.10% | 935.25% | -40.34% | -83.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR.TO and QBTS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, EFR.TO and QBTS have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
EFR.TO:
CA$5.08B
QBTS:
$8.59B
EFR.TO:
-$0.30
QBTS:
-$1.08
EFR.TO:
41.45
QBTS:
637.12
EFR.TO:
5.03
QBTS:
7.64
EFR.TO:
$84.86M
QBTS:
$12.44M
EFR.TO:
$25.23M
QBTS:
$8.25M
EFR.TO:
-$72.89M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR.TO vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
EFR.TO
QBTS
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFR.TO | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 0.71 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 1.23 | +5.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR.TO | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -96.52% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.09% | -71.31% | +20.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.28% | -78.15% | +18.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.13% | -48.03% | -44.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.43% | -64.70% | -26.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.24% | 41.23% | -14.99% |
Volatility
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) is 29.13%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that EFR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFR.TO | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.13% | 42.66% | -13.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.37% | 77.06% | -10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.73% | 108.27% | -10.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.77% | 150.92% | -79.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.81% | 150.92% | -80.11% |
Dividends
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither EFR.TO nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EFR.TO vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EFR.TO and QBTS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFR.TO and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer