EFR.TO vs. NNE
EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) and NNE (NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.) are both stocks. EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy), while NNE operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, EFR.TO returned 187.96% vs -21.82% for NNE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EFR.TO is traded in CAD, while NNE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NNE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than NNE's -1.40% return.
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -24.06%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 187.96%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
NNE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -14.10%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -33.53%
- 1Y
- -21.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 5.89% | 169.01% | -8.43% |
NNE NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. | -1.40% | -7.96% | 622.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR.TO and NNE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024 | 0.38 |
The correlation between EFR.TO and NNE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFR.TO:
CA$5.08B
NNE:
$1.20B
EFR.TO:
-$0.30
NNE:
-$202.05
EFR.TO:
5.03
NNE:
0.00
EFR.TO:
$84.86M
NNE:
$0.00
EFR.TO:
$25.23M
NNE:
-$769.48K
EFR.TO:
-$72.89M
NNE:
$14.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR.TO vs. NNE — Risk / Return Rank
EFR.TO
NNE
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFR.TO | NNE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.03 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.40 | +4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | -0.64 | +7.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than NNE's maximum drawdown of -77.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and NNE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR.TO | NNE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -77.51% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.09% | -66.56% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.13% | -58.95% | -33.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.43% | -36.79% | -54.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.24% | 41.45% | -15.21% |
Volatility
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) is 29.13%, while NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) has a volatility of 32.83%. This indicates that EFR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFR.TO | NNE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.13% | 32.83% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.37% | 69.63% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.73% | 98.92% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.77% | 151.39% | -79.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.81% | 151.39% | -80.58% |
Dividends
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EFR.TO nor NNE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EFR.TO vs. NNE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EFR.TO and NNE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFR.TO and NNE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer