PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFO vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFO vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFO vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
2.62%58.51%-2.15%25.77%-33.62%8.71%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
-4.22%14.22%23.12%23.00%-16.78%12.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.


EFO

1D
2.70%
1M
-10.01%
YTD
2.62%
6M
8.73%
1Y
40.94%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
9.88%

XDSQ

1D
0.71%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
-4.22%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFO vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EFO vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO
EFO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFOXDSQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.81

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.27

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.21

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

5.87

+0.94

EFO vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFO and XDSQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFOXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.81

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.61

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and XDSQ is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EFO vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.69%1.65%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFO vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and XDSQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFOXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-26.06%

-37.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-12.18%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.12%

-6.46%

-7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.78%

-5.08%

-13.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.06%

2.50%

+3.56%

Volatility

EFO vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFOXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.52%

5.68%

+8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.02%

9.63%

+12.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.16%

17.99%

+17.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

15.32%

+17.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.88%

15.32%

+18.56%