EFO vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
EFO and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
EFO vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFO vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 2.62% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 8.71% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.22% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.
EFO
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -10.01%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 40.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFO vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
XDSQ
EFO vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.81 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.27 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.21 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 5.87 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.81 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.61 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and XDSQ is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EFO vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.69% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -26.06% | -37.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -12.18% | -10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.12% | -6.46% | -7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -5.08% | -13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.06% | 2.50% | +3.56% |
Volatility
EFO vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.52% | 5.68% | +8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 9.63% | +12.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.16% | 17.99% | +17.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 15.32% | +17.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 15.32% | +18.56% |