EFO vs. TSLG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG).
EFO and TSLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. TSLG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Dec 12, 2024.
Performance
EFO vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFO vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | -0.08% | 58.51% | -6.47% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -35.84% | -26.70% | -16.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -35.84% return.
EFO
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
TSLG
- 1D
- 9.07%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -35.84%
- 6M
- -39.88%
- 1Y
- 34.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFO vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
TSLG
EFO vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.32 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.26 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.59 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 1.27 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.32 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.44 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and TSLG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFO vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than TSLG's 10.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.73% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 10.20% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and TSLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -82.86% | +19.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -50.92% | +28.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.38% | -67.59% | +51.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -58.04% | +39.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 23.82% | -17.82% |
Volatility
EFO vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) is 15.10%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 22.28%. This indicates that EFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.10% | 22.28% | -7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | 59.35% | -37.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.11% | 110.61% | -75.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.58% | 119.00% | -86.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 119.00% | -85.13% |