PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFO vs. SCHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFO vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 11.79%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.


EFO

1D
-3.85%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
12.32%
6M
11.55%
1Y
36.54%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
11.79%

SCHC

1D
-2.44%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
5.56%
6M
5.19%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
12.32%58.51%-2.15%25.77%-33.62%19.38%2.29%40.93%-30.91%51.78%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
5.56%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and SCHC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.82

The correlation between EFO and SCHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFO vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFO
SCHC

Financial Services

41.0%
13.1%

Basic Materials

-

11.7%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.1%

Energy

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

16.1%

Real Estate

-

5.0%

Technology

-

6.7%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

EFO
41.0%
SCHC
13.1%

Basic Materials

EFO

-

SCHC
11.7%

Communication Services

EFO

-

SCHC
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EFO

-

SCHC
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

EFO

-

SCHC
3.1%

Energy

EFO

-

SCHC
4.4%

Healthcare

EFO

-

SCHC
3.7%

Industrials

EFO

-

SCHC
16.1%

Real Estate

EFO

-

SCHC
5.0%

Technology

EFO

-

SCHC
6.7%

Utilities

EFO

-

SCHC
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFO vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO
EFO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFOSCHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.68

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

6.09

-0.45

EFO vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFO and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFO vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and SCHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFOSCHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-43.94%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-12.48%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-15.52%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.95%

-36.48%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.52%

-43.94%

-19.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.00%

-6.75%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.62%

-10.03%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.49%

3.44%

+3.05%

Volatility

EFO vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 6.27%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFOSCHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

6.27%

+4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.85%

14.15%

+12.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.71%

16.36%

+15.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.20%

17.65%

+15.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.65%

17.85%

+15.80%

EFO vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFO vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than SCHC's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.54%1.65%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.47%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFO and SCHC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFO has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SCHC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

On 10-year performance, EFO leads with 11.79% vs 8.41% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFO has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.54% for EFO.

EFO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.08% for SCHC.

SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFO and SCHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer