EFO vs. SCHC
EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFO returned 11.79%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for SCHC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
EFO vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 11.79%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.
EFO
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 36.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
SCHC
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
EFO vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 12.32% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 5.56% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and SCHC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EFO and SCHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFO vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFO
SCHC
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EFO
SCHC
Basic Materials
EFO
-
SCHC
Communication Services
EFO
-
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
EFO
-
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
EFO
-
SCHC
Energy
EFO
-
SCHC
Healthcare
EFO
-
SCHC
Industrials
EFO
-
SCHC
Real Estate
EFO
-
SCHC
Technology
EFO
-
SCHC
Utilities
EFO
-
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
SCHC
EFO vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFO | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.68 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 6.09 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFO vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -43.94% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -12.48% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -15.52% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | -36.48% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | -43.94% | -19.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -6.75% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -10.03% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | 3.44% | +3.05% |
Volatility
EFO vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 6.27%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.89% | 6.27% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.85% | 14.15% | +12.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.71% | 16.36% | +15.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.20% | 17.65% | +15.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.65% | 17.85% | +15.80% |
EFO vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFO vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than SCHC's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.47% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFO and SCHC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFO has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SCHC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 10-year performance, EFO leads with 11.79% vs 8.41% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFO has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.54% for EFO.
EFO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.08% for SCHC.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFO and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer