EFO vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFO is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

EFO vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

EFO

• 1D: -3.85%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 12.32%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 36.54%
• 3Y*: 23.94%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	12.32%	9.99%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and LINT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.36

EFO vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFO	LINT
Financial Services	41.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EFO vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO

EFO Risk / Return Rank: 35
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFO	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	—	—

Drawdowns

EFO vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFO	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.52%	-49.54%	-13.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.00%	-12.86%	+6.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.62%	-20.48%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EFO	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.71%	168.83%	-137.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.20%	168.83%	-135.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.65%	168.83%	-135.18%

EFO vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFO vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	1.54%	1.65%	2.24%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	0.11%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFO and LINT in my portfolio?

EFO and LINT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EFO or LINT?

On fees, EFO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFO or LINT?

EFO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFO or LINT?

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between EFO and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.97% for LINT.