PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFNL vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFNL vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFNL vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
4.17%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%-1.05%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
4.65%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFNL achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 4.65% return.


EFNL

1D
1.70%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
4.17%
6M
16.25%
1Y
41.22%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
8.79%

FLGB

1D
1.61%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
4.65%
6M
10.11%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFNL vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFNL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EFNL vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFNL vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFNLFLGBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

1.66

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

2.23

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

2.35

+1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.52

10.37

+6.15

EFNL vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFNL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFNL and FLGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFNLFLGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.66

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.74

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.42

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between EFNL and FLGB is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EFNL vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

EFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than FLGB's 3.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
3.26%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.34%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFNL vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFNL drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, smaller than the maximum FLGB drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFNL and FLGB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFNLFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-42.61%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-11.86%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-25.90%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-5.13%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-6.75%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.69%

-0.21%

Volatility

EFNL vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) have volatilities of 6.82% and 6.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFNLFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

6.64%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

10.32%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

16.88%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

16.47%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

18.98%

+1.01%