EFG vs. SCHD
EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFG returned 8.02%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SCHD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
EFG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.02%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
EFG
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 14.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.02%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
EFG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 8.93% | 20.70% | 1.53% | 17.55% | -23.12% | 11.01% | 17.85% | 27.47% | -12.93% | 28.86% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.82% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFG and SCHD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EFG and SCHD has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EFG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFG
SCHD
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Industrials
EFG
SCHD
Technology
EFG
SCHD
Healthcare
EFG
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
EFG
SCHD
Financial Services
EFG
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
EFG
SCHD
Communication Services
EFG
SCHD
Basic Materials
EFG
SCHD
Utilities
EFG
SCHD
Real Estate
EFG
SCHD
-
Energy
EFG
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
EFG
SCHD
EFG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.47 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 6.26 | -5.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 15.38 | -11.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.64 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.59 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.77 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.86 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
EFG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.40% | -33.37% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -4.61% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -16.13% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -16.85% | -18.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -33.37% | -2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -3.32% | -8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.87% | +1.59% |
Volatility
EFG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that EFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 2.69% | +3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 7.65% | +6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 10.95% | +6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 14.38% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 16.71% | +0.98% |
EFG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 2.32% | 2.53% | 1.64% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 1.56% | 2.20% | 1.75% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFG has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.79% vs 8.02% for EFG. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.32% for EFG.
EFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer