EFG vs. EFO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO).
EFG and EFO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2005. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. Both EFG and EFO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EFG vs. EFO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFG vs. EFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | -2.24% | 20.70% | 1.53% | 17.55% | -23.12% | 11.01% | 17.85% | 27.47% | -12.93% | 28.86% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | -0.08% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than EFO's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed EFO with an annualized return of 7.30%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
EFG
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -9.46%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 14.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
EFO
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFG vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EFO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFG vs. EFO — Risk / Return Rank
EFG
EFO
EFG vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFG | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 1.08 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.60 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.59 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 5.90 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFG | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.08 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.22 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.28 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFG and EFO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EFG vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison
EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than EFO's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 2.59% | 2.53% | 1.64% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 1.56% | 2.20% | 1.75% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.73% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFG vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, smaller than the maximum EFO drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and EFO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFG | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.40% | -63.52% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -22.18% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -53.95% | +18.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -63.52% | +27.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.73% | -16.38% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -18.78% | +6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 6.00% | -2.67% |
Volatility
EFG vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) is 8.47%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a volatility of 15.10%. This indicates that EFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFG | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 15.10% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 21.89% | -9.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.05% | 35.11% | -16.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 32.58% | -14.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 33.87% | -16.33% |