PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFFI vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFFI vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF (EFFI) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFFI achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.32% return.


EFFI

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.22%
6M
3.31%
YTD
5.34%
1Y
16.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.87%
6M
14.97%
YTD
18.32%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFFI vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EFFI and IFLO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.84

The correlation between EFFI and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFFI vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFFI
EFFI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EFFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EFFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFFI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFFI vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF (EFFI) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFFIIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

4.91

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

16.50

-10.84

EFFI vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFFI and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFFI vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFFI drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFFI and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFFIIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.64%

-6.44%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-6.44%

-4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-2.22%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-1.29%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

1.91%

+0.94%

Volatility

EFFI vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF (EFFI) is 3.93%, while VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that EFFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFFIIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.77%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

12.05%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

14.71%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

14.61%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

14.61%

+1.82%

EFFI vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFFI vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

EFFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFFI and IFLO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFLO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to EFFI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFFI dropped -13.64% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 31.49% vs 16.09% for EFFI. On fees, EFFI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFFI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 31.49% return vs 16.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFFI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

EFFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFFI and 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFFI and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer