EFFI vs. FDT
EFFI (Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EFFI is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. Over the past year, EFFI returned 20.38% vs 54.27% for FDT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFFI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
EFFI vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFFI achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 26.09% return.
EFFI
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 20.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 6M
- 26.12%
- 1Y
- 54.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
EFFI vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFFI Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF | 5.11% | 33.41% | -3.24% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 26.09% | 52.21% | -2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFFI and FDT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EFFI and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFFI vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
EFFI
FDT
EFFI vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF (EFFI) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFFI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.50 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 4.07 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 15.38 | -8.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFFI vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFFI drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFFI and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFFI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -46.10% | +32.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -13.41% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.13% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -10.75% | +8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.54% | -0.70% |
Volatility
EFFI vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF (EFFI) is 3.67%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that EFFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFFI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 8.64% | -4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 17.40% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 19.71% | -4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 18.47% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 18.62% | -2.09% |
EFFI vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFFI vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
EFFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than FDT's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFFI Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF | 4.12% | 4.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.82% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFFI and FDT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to EFFI (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFFI dropped -13.64% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 1-year performance, FDT leads with 54.27% vs 20.38% for EFFI. On fees, EFFI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFFI has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDT has performed better with a 54.27% return vs 20.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFFI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
EFFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.82% for FDT.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFFI and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFFI and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer