PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.92

The correlation between EFAX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
VEA

Financial Services

18.6%
23.3%

Technology

11.6%
13.8%

Industrials

9.5%
19.2%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.7%

Energy

1.5%
5.4%

Utilities

1.2%
3.3%

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
VEA
23.3%

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
VEA
13.8%

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
VEA
19.2%

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
VEA
7.5%

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
VEA
5.6%

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
VEA
3.4%

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
VEA
2.7%

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
VEA
5.4%

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.81

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

10.94

-5.34

EFAX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.09

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.58

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.25

+0.28

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-60.68%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-11.63%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-13.45%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-29.71%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.90%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-13.29%

+6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.98%

+0.36%

Volatility

EFAX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) is 5.24%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that EFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.66%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

13.32%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

15.66%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.55%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.36%

-0.26%

EFAX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EFAX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to EFAX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.60% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.

EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer