EFAX vs. RBIL
EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EFAX returned 19.90% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
EFAX vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAX vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 7.16% | 21.70% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.32% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and RBIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
RBIL
EFAX vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 2.13 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 7.82 | -6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 42.95 | -37.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -0.52% | -32.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -0.52% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -0.50% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -0.07% | -6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 0.10% | +3.25% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 0.36% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 0.85% | +13.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 0.95% | +15.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 1.07% | +15.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 1.07% | +16.06% |
EFAX vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAX vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.20% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAX and RBIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, EFAX leads with 19.90% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EFAX has performed better with a 19.90% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.20% for EFAX.
EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAX and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer