PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. ESGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. ESGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than ESGG's 14.72% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

ESGG

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.86%
YTD
14.72%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. ESGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.72%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-8.44%23.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and ESGG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.81

The correlation between EFAX and ESGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. ESGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
ESGG

Financial Services

18.6%
19.4%

Technology

11.6%
39.9%

Industrials

9.5%
5.2%

Healthcare

9.0%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.2%

Energy

1.5%
4.3%

Utilities

1.2%
2.1%

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
ESGG
19.4%

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
ESGG
39.9%

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
ESGG
5.2%

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
ESGG
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
ESGG
4.0%

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
ESGG
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
ESGG
5.0%

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
ESGG
0.9%

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
ESGG
1.2%

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
ESGG
4.3%

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
ESGG
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. ESGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. ESGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXESGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

2.62

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

3.69

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.44

-1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.61

15.38

-9.78

EFAX vs. ESGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ESGG Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and ESGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXESGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.62

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.80

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.86

-0.33

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. ESGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, roughly equal to the maximum ESGG drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and ESGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXESGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-32.31%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-9.16%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-16.71%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-27.57%

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.48%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-4.66%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.05%

+1.29%

Volatility

EFAX vs. ESGG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) at 3.76%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXESGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

3.76%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

9.67%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

12.05%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.04%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

16.51%

+0.59%

EFAX vs. ESGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAX vs. ESGG - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than ESGG's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.21%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAX and ESGG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to ESGG (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs ESGG's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.

EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.21% for ESGG.

EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ESGG is Large Cap Growth Equities. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.42% for ESGG.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and ESGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer