PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAS vs. NIHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAS vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than NIHI's 6.39% return.


EFAS

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
13.61%
6M
18.42%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

NIHI

1D
0.41%
1M
2.67%
YTD
6.39%
6M
9.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and NIHI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.62

EFAS vs. NIHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAS
NIHI

Financial Services

30.1%
22.9%

Utilities

14.4%
3.8%

Energy

13.7%
4.0%

Real Estate

11.3%
3.1%

Industrials

9.9%
20.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
6.6%

Healthcare

0.1%
9.8%

Technology

0.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

EFAS
30.1%
NIHI
22.9%

Utilities

EFAS
14.4%
NIHI
3.8%

Energy

EFAS
13.7%
NIHI
4.0%

Real Estate

EFAS
11.3%
NIHI
3.1%

Industrials

EFAS
9.9%
NIHI
20.5%

Communication Services

EFAS
8.6%
NIHI
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

EFAS
8.1%
NIHI
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAS
1.9%
NIHI
8.2%

Basic Materials

EFAS
1.8%
NIHI
6.6%

Healthcare

EFAS
0.1%
NIHI
9.8%

Technology

EFAS
0.1%
NIHI
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAS vs. NIHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NIHI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFASNIHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.34

EFAS vs. NIHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFASNIHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.17

-0.60

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than NIHI's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and NIHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFASNIHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-10.88%

-33.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-0.63%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-2.39%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

EFAS vs. NIHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFASNIHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

15.14%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

15.14%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

15.14%

+3.19%

EFAS vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAS vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than NIHI's 7.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.59%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
7.79%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAS and NIHI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for NIHI.

NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 7.79%, compared with 4.59% for EFAS.

EFAS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NIHI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.68% for NIHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAS and NIHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer