EFAS vs. LVHI
EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 12.99%/yr vs 16.12%/yr for LVHI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
EFAS vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EFAS having a 14.78% return and LVHI slightly higher at 14.97%.
EFAS
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 14.78% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -11.60% | 22.76% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 14.97% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAS and LVHI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EFAS and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAS vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAS
LVHI
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
EFAS
LVHI
Utilities
EFAS
LVHI
Energy
EFAS
LVHI
Real Estate
EFAS
LVHI
Industrials
EFAS
LVHI
Communication Services
EFAS
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
EFAS
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
EFAS
LVHI
Basic Materials
EFAS
LVHI
Healthcare
EFAS
LVHI
Technology
EFAS
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAS vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
EFAS
LVHI
EFAS vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAS | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.63 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 5.25 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 21.55 | -9.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAS vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAS | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -32.31% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -6.08% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.84% | -11.99% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -11.99% | -16.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | 0.00% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -3.49% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.48% | +0.69% |
Volatility
EFAS vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.75%. This indicates that EFAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAS | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 2.75% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 7.74% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 9.64% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 11.07% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 13.72% | +4.55% |
EFAS vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAS vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than LVHI's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.75% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.64% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAS and LVHI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAS has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to LVHI (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 16.12% vs 12.99% for EFAS. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 12.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 4.64% for LVHI.
EFAS is categorized as Dividend, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFAS and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAS and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer