EFAS vs. JEPI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Dividend funds. EFAS is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 14.43%/yr vs 7.40%/yr for JEPI. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EFAS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.

Performance

EFAS vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 4.52% return.

EFAS

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 6.31%
• 6M: 14.73%
• YTD: 20.56%
• 1Y: 32.01%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 14.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.80%

JEPI

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.16%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: 9.21%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	$411.25K	$354.75K	$345.09K
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF	$260.98M	$260.42M	$297.70M

EFAS vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	20.56%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	35.66%
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF	4.52%	8.09%	12.57%	9.83%	-3.49%	21.52%	18.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and JEPI is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020	0.49

EFAS vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAS	JEPI
Financial Services	35.3%	8.9%
Real Estate	15.6%	2.6%
Utilities	11.8%	4.9%
Energy	10.3%	2.6%
Communication Services	8.9%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Industrials	6.6%	11.2%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	9.8%
Healthcare	0.1%	12.9%
Technology	0.1%	15.4%

Return for Risk

EFAS vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 94
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

JEPI

JEPI Risk / Return Rank: 48
JEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
JEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFAS vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFAS	JEPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	1.25	+1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	1.85	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.23	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.07	1.52	+4.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	4.32	+10.60

EFAS vs. JEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the JEPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and JEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and JEPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAS	JEPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-13.71%	-30.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-6.68%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.84%	-13.26%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.81%	-13.71%	-15.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.68%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-2.13%	-4.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	2.36%	-0.21%

Volatility

EFAS vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 2.38%. This indicates that EFAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAS	JEPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	2.38%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	6.37%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	8.15%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	11.10%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	10.73%	+7.50%

EFAS vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAS vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than JEPI's 7.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.52%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF	7.34%	8.25%	7.33%	8.40%	11.68%	6.59%	5.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAS and JEPI in my portfolio?

EFAS and JEPI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAS or JEPI?

EFAS has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to JEPI (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs JEPI's -13.71%.

Which ETF is better, EFAS or JEPI?

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 14.43% vs 7.40% for JEPI. On fees, JEPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAS or JEPI?

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 7.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAS or JEPI?

JEPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAS or JEPI?

JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.34%, compared with 4.52% for EFAS.

What is the main difference between EFAS and JEPI?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFAS and 0.35% for JEPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.