EFAS vs. GMOI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index while GMOI tracks the MSCI World ex USA Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EFAS returned 29.12% vs 37.41% for GMOI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.

Performance

EFAS vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than GMOI's 14.33% return.

EFAS

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 18.87%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: —

GMOI

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 14.33%
• 6M: 15.48%
• 1Y: 37.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	15.45%	46.83%	-4.51%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	14.33%	45.64%	-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and GMOI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.72

The correlation between EFAS and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EFAS vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 89
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GMOI

GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 89
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFAS	GMOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.69	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	3.70	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.64	4.33	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.75	17.08	-2.33

EFAS vs. GMOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the GMOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and GMOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and GMOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAS	GMOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-14.67%	-29.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-8.36%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-1.69%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.13%	-0.11%

Volatility

EFAS vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 3.35%, while GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAS	GMOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	4.15%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.58%	10.62%	-2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.87%	13.47%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	15.62%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	15.62%	+2.70%

EFAS vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAS vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than GMOI's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.62%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	2.39%	2.74%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAS and GMOI in my portfolio?

EFAS and GMOI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAS or GMOI?

GMOI has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to EFAS (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs GMOI's -14.67%.

Which ETF is better, EFAS or GMOI?

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 37.41% vs 29.12% for EFAS. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAS or GMOI?

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 37.41% return vs 29.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAS or GMOI?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAS or GMOI?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.39% for GMOI.

What is the main difference between EFAS and GMOI?

EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value. They also come from different issuers: Global X and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.60% for GMOI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.