EFAS vs. DTCR
EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 12.04%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for DTCR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFAS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTCR.
Performance
EFAS vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DTCR
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 52.56%
- 6M
- 54.49%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 12.96% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | 29.81% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 52.56% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAS and DTCR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.43 |
The correlation between EFAS and DTCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFAS vs. DTCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAS
DTCR
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Financial Services
EFAS
DTCR
-
Utilities
EFAS
DTCR
-
Energy
EFAS
DTCR
-
Real Estate
EFAS
DTCR
Industrials
EFAS
DTCR
-
Communication Services
EFAS
DTCR
Consumer Defensive
EFAS
DTCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
EFAS
DTCR
-
Basic Materials
EFAS
DTCR
-
Healthcare
EFAS
DTCR
-
Technology
EFAS
DTCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAS vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
EFAS
DTCR
EFAS vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 3.90 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | 4.71 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.61 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 6.61 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.48 | 20.78 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 3.90 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.72 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.76 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
EFAS vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -38.98% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -12.89% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.84% | -24.96% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -38.98% | +10.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -0.74% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -12.37% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 4.09% | -2.10% |
Volatility
EFAS vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 2.96%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 7.16% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.20% | 16.92% | -8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.60% | 21.84% | -11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 21.83% | -6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 21.90% | -3.57% |
EFAS vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAS vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than DTCR's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 5.05% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAS and DTCR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTCR has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs DTCR's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 15.53% vs 12.04% for EFAS. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.
EFAS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DTCR is REIT. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.50% for DTCR.
DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAS and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer