PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFA vs. NOINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFA vs. NOINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than NOINX's 8.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFA having a 10.16% annualized return and NOINX not far behind at 9.89%.


EFA

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
9.11%
6M
8.68%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
10.16%

NOINX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
8.37%
6M
7.94%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFA vs. NOINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
9.11%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
8.37%31.86%3.69%18.08%-14.24%11.08%7.92%21.98%-13.76%25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EFA and NOINX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2005

0.96

The correlation between EFA and NOINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFA vs. NOINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NOINX
NOINX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NOINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NOINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFA vs. NOINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFANOINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.03

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

7.44

-0.29

EFA vs. NOINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the NOINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFA and NOINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFA vs. NOINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, roughly equal to the maximum NOINX drawdown of -61.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and NOINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFANOINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-61.10%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-11.12%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-13.73%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-29.34%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

-33.69%

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-2.31%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-12.54%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.01%

+0.05%

Volatility

EFA vs. NOINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) is 5.26%, while Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that EFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFANOINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.57%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

14.00%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

16.31%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.15%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.29%

+0.73%

EFA vs. NOINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than NOINX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFA vs. NOINX - Dividend Comparison

EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, which matches NOINX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.26%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
3.29%3.57%3.70%3.37%2.71%3.19%2.04%3.08%3.47%2.45%3.21%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EFA and NOINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NOINX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to EFA (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFA dropped -61.04% vs NOINX's -61.10%.

EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFA and NOINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer