PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOINX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOINX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 8.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOINX having a 9.29% annualized return and VMVFX not far ahead at 9.51%.


NOINX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.11%
YTD
9.68%
6M
12.20%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
9.29%

VMVFX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.52%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.94%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
9.68%31.86%3.69%18.08%-14.24%11.08%7.92%21.98%-13.76%25.28%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
8.43%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NOINX and VMVFX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between NOINX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOINX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOINX
NOINX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NOINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOINX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NOINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOINXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.08

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

8.13

-0.79

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOINX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOINXVMVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.92

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.01

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.76

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.82

-0.50

Drawdowns

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOINX drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOINX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOINXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.10%

-33.09%

-28.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-6.27%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-7.96%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.34%

-13.02%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-33.09%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.18%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-2.83%

-9.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.60%

+1.40%

Volatility

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 1.94%. This indicates that NOINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOINXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

1.94%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

5.17%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

6.81%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

10.76%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

12.48%

+4.03%

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOINX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

NOINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than VMVFX's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
3.25%3.57%3.70%3.37%2.71%3.19%2.04%3.08%3.47%2.45%3.21%2.74%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.20%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOINX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOINX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to VMVFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOINX dropped -61.10% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

VMVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOINX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer