PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOINX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOINX achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 10.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOINX having a 9.55% annualized return and VMVFX not far behind at 9.21%.


NOINX

1D
2.86%
1M
2.01%
6M
7.31%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
9.55%
ALL TIME*
6.32%

VMVFX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.46%
6M
6.37%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
9.21%
ALL TIME*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
12.75%31.86%3.69%18.08%-14.24%11.08%7.92%21.98%-13.76%25.28%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
10.15%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NOINX and VMVFX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between NOINX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOINX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOINX
NOINX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NOINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NOINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOINXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.31

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

8.93

-0.91

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOINX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOINX drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOINX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOINXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.10%

-33.09%

-28.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-6.27%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-7.96%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.34%

-13.02%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-33.09%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-2.80%

-9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.62%

+1.37%

Volatility

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 1.95%. This indicates that NOINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOINXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

1.95%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

5.56%

+8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

6.99%

+9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

10.76%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

12.43%

+3.83%

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOINX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NOINX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

NOINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than VMVFX's 9.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
3.17%3.57%3.70%3.37%2.71%3.19%2.04%3.08%3.47%2.45%3.21%2.74%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.06%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOINX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOINX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to VMVFX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOINX dropped -61.10% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

VMVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOINX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer