EFA vs. IDEV
EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - EFA tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFA returned 8.66%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for IDEV. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EFA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
EFA vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than IDEV's 9.92% return.
EFA
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
EFA vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.36% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 16.52% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 9.92% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFA and IDEV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between EFA and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFA vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFA
IDEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFA
IDEV
Industrials
EFA
IDEV
Healthcare
EFA
IDEV
Technology
EFA
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
EFA
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
EFA
IDEV
Basic Materials
EFA
IDEV
Communication Services
EFA
IDEV
Energy
EFA
IDEV
Utilities
EFA
IDEV
Real Estate
EFA
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFA vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
EFA
IDEV
EFA vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.62 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 2.31 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.22 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 8.73 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.62 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.55 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.55 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
EFA vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than IDEV's maximum drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.04% | -34.77% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -11.20% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.05% | -13.41% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.53% | -29.15% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.08% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -6.57% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.85% | +0.19% |
Volatility
EFA vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.71%. This indicates that EFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 4.71% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 12.07% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 14.52% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 16.26% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 17.27% | -0.01% |
EFA vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFA vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, which matches IDEV's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.09% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.10% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, EFA and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EFA has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to IDEV (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFA dropped -61.04% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.88% vs 8.66% for EFA. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.
EFA and IDEV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.09%.
EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net), while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EFA and 0.05% for IDEV.
IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFA and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer