EEV vs. SQQQ
EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EEV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEV returned -22.12%/yr vs -55.28%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EEV vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -35.24% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EEV has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -22.12%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.28% annualized return.
EEV
- 1D
- 7.43%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- 6M
- -27.37%
- YTD
- -35.24%
- 1Y
- -49.99%
- 3Y*
- -29.87%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- -22.12%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 5.74%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -36.57%
- YTD
- -40.27%
- 1Y
- -56.10%
- 3Y*
- -51.78%
- 5Y*
- -45.66%
- 10Y*
- -55.28%
EEV vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -35.24% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEV and SQQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EEV and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEV vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEV
SQQQ
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEV
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EEV
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
EEV
SQQQ
Industrials
EEV
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
EEV
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
EEV
SQQQ
-
Energy
EEV
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
EEV
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
EEV
SQQQ
-
Utilities
EEV
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
EEV
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEV vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EEV
SQQQ
EEV vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.82 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.92 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | -1.71 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEV vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -100.00% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.51% | -61.03% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.51% | -92.51% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.14% | -97.27% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.39% | -99.97% | +6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -100.00% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.02% | -92.75% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.00% | 32.78% | +0.22% |
Volatility
EEV vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is 22.55%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.05%. This indicates that EEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.55% | 26.05% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.38% | 45.88% | -2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.68% | 55.64% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 67.87% | -28.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.55% | 66.56% | -25.01% |
EEV vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EEV and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EEV vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, less than SQQQ's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.23% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.00% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEV and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to EEV (22.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.88% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, EEV leads with -22.12% vs -55.28% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EEV has been the lower-risk option at 22.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEV has performed better with a -22.12% return vs -55.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEV and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 7.23% for EEV.
EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.01 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEV and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer