EEMX vs. PIE
EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMX returned 7.17%/yr vs 5.77%/yr for PIE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
EEMX vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 36.43% return.
EEMX
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 28.71%
- YTD
- 36.43%
- 1Y
- 57.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
EEMX vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 19.72% | 35.23% | 7.22% | 9.80% | -19.75% | -3.57% | 19.55% | 18.56% | -16.76% | 38.46% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 36.43% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMX and PIE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between EEMX and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEMX vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMX
PIE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
EEMX
PIE
Financial Services
EEMX
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
EEMX
PIE
Communication Services
EEMX
PIE
Industrials
EEMX
PIE
Basic Materials
EEMX
PIE
Consumer Defensive
EEMX
PIE
Healthcare
EEMX
PIE
Utilities
EEMX
PIE
Real Estate
EEMX
PIE
Energy
EEMX
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMX vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
EEMX
PIE
EEMX vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMX | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 5.87 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 17.04 | -7.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMX vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMX | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -72.98% | +33.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -9.87% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -28.69% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.19% | -40.32% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -6.66% | -2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -25.95% | +11.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 3.39% | +0.56% |
Volatility
EEMX vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) have volatilities of 11.67% and 11.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMX | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 11.98% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.48% | 22.06% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 25.21% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 21.05% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 21.64% | -0.95% |
EEMX vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMX vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than PIE's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 1.88% | 2.28% | 2.26% | 2.20% | 2.38% | 1.72% | 1.42% | 2.57% | 2.41% | 2.45% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.77% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMX and PIE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to EEMX (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 5-year performance, EEMX leads with 7.17% vs 5.77% for PIE. On fees, EEMX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EEMX has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EEMX has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.77% for PIE.
EEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.90% for PIE.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMX and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer