EEMX vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMX returned 7.67%/yr vs 18.75%/yr for FLKR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

EEMX vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 26.15% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 109.27% return.

EEMX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 26.15%
• 6M: 27.00%
• 1Y: 47.10%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: 4.03%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 109.27%
• 6M: 115.17%
• 1Y: 182.38%
• 3Y*: 50.96%
• 5Y*: 18.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMX vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	26.15%	35.23%	7.22%	9.80%	-19.75%	-3.57%	19.55%	18.56%	-16.76%	3.17%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	109.27%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMX and FLKR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.76

The correlation between EEMX and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMX vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMX	FLKR
Technology	26.8%	62.9%
Financial Services	11.1%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	6.3%
Communication Services	4.4%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.6%	1.9%
Industrials	2.3%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	1.4%
Healthcare	1.4%	2.4%
Utilities	0.9%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Energy	0.3%	0.7%

Return for Risk

EEMX vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMX

EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 73
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMX vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMX	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	3.79	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.64	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.55	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	7.97	-4.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.72	27.26	-14.54

EEMX vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMX and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMX vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMX	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.90%	-50.06%	+10.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-23.03%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-26.39%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.99%	-49.51%	+12.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-7.17%	+2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.67%	-21.97%	+7.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	6.72%	-3.01%

Volatility

EEMX vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) is 12.32%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 28.63%. This indicates that EEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMX	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.32%	28.63%	-16.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.50%	45.31%	-23.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.42%	48.41%	-24.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.81%	30.56%	-10.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.61%	28.90%	-8.29%

EEMX vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMX vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than FLKR's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	1.79%	2.28%	2.26%	2.20%	2.38%	1.72%	1.42%	2.57%	2.41%	2.45%	0.15%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.75%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMX and FLKR in my portfolio?

EEMX and FLKR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMX or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (28.63%) compared to EEMX (12.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, EEMX or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 18.75% vs 7.67% for EEMX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EEMX has been the lower-risk option at 12.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMX or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 18.75% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMX or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMX or FLKR?

EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.75% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between EEMX and FLKR?

EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.