EEMX vs. BKEM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMX returned 7.82%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for BKEM. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

EEMX vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EEMX having a 27.49% return and BKEM slightly higher at 28.54%.

EEMX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 27.49%
• 6M: 30.63%
• 1Y: 54.54%
• 3Y*: 24.62%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: —

BKEM

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 28.54%
• 6M: 30.76%
• 1Y: 52.98%
• 3Y*: 23.65%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMX vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	27.49%	35.23%	7.22%	9.80%	-19.75%	-3.57%	48.22%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	28.54%	30.55%	7.53%	8.68%	-19.43%	-3.91%	47.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMX and BKEM is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020	0.98

The correlation between EEMX and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMX vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMX	BKEM
Technology	38.7%	35.9%
Financial Services	20.7%	18.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.7%
Industrials	7.6%	9.0%
Communication Services	7.3%	6.6%
Basic Materials	6.3%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	2.9%
Healthcare	3.0%	3.2%
Utilities	1.5%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.2%
Energy	0.5%	4.0%

Return for Risk

EEMX vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMX

EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 80
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 81
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMX vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEMX	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	2.73	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.58	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.48	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	4.06	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.59	15.58	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEMX vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMX and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEMX	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	2.73	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.38	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.74	-0.27

Drawdowns

EEMX vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, roughly equal to the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMX	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.90%	-39.48%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-13.11%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-18.38%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.08%	-36.53%	-0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-2.25%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.73%	-15.99%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	3.41%	+0.10%

Volatility

EEMX vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) at 8.13%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMX	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.86%	8.13%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	16.82%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.78%	19.52%	+1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.15%	18.73%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.22%	19.12%	+1.10%

EEMX vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMX vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than BKEM's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.47%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	1.77%	2.28%	2.26%	2.20%	2.38%	1.72%	1.42%	2.57%	2.41%	2.45%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMX and BKEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, EEMX and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EEMX or BKEM?

EEMX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to BKEM (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

Which ETF is better, EEMX or BKEM?

On 5-year performance, EEMX leads with 7.82% vs 7.09% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BKEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMX or BKEM?

Over the 5-year period, EEMX has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMX or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMX or BKEM?

EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.47% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between EEMX and BKEM?

EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.11% for BKEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.