PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 40.25% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


EEMO

1D
-1.32%
1M
18.59%
YTD
40.25%
6M
41.33%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.88%

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMO vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
40.25%10.99%2.20%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and USOY is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between EEMO and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMO vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMOUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

4.03

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.67

7.74

+7.93

EEMO vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMOUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.89

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.99

-0.86

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-17.46%

-31.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-14.29%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-5.11%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-6.47%

-13.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

7.42%

-3.75%

Volatility

EEMO vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) at 11.62%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

11.62%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.10%

27.18%

-5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.45%

30.44%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

26.13%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

26.13%

-4.54%

EEMO vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.64%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and USOY have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to USOY (11.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, EEMO leads with 57.41% vs 57.29% for USOY. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, USOY has been the lower-risk option at 11.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 57.41% return vs 57.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

EEMO is categorized as Momentum, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 1.22% for USOY.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer