EEMO vs. SOXQ
EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EEMO returned 24.00%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 36.85% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
EEMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 36.85%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- 51.13%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 36.85% | 10.99% | 9.88% | 13.90% | -18.73% | -10.32% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMO and SOXQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between EEMO and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMO
SOXQ
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMO
SOXQ
Financial Services
EEMO
SOXQ
Basic Materials
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Industrials
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Energy
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Utilities
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
EEMO
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMO vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
EEMO
SOXQ
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.69 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 11.08 | -7.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 42.47 | -28.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 5.11 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.96 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -46.01% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -15.59% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.06% | -39.36% | +13.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -2.15% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.17% | -12.95% | -7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 4.06% | -0.38% |
Volatility
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) have volatilities of 14.18% and 13.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 13.55% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.26% | 26.81% | -4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.58% | 33.80% | -9.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 36.38% | -17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 36.38% | -14.79% |
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMO vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.68% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 1.51% | 1.53% | 2.13% | 13.10% | 5.13% | 1.55% | 2.92% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMO and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMO has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to SOXQ (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 24.00% for EEMO. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SOXQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 24.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.
EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
EEMO is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMO and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer