PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EEMO vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EEMO vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
-3.42%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%16.46%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
9.38%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 9.38% return.


EEMO

1D
4.09%
1M
-7.29%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
-5.68%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
5.14%

FRDM

1D
2.18%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
9.38%
6M
26.14%
1Y
61.89%
3Y*
27.23%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEMO vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMO vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMOFRDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

2.63

-1.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

3.24

-2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.48

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

3.75

-2.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.12

15.41

-11.29

EEMO vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and FRDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMOFRDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.63

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.68

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.68

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and FRDM is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EEMO vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FRDM's 2.00% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
2.38%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
2.00%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and FRDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-40.49%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-16.87%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

-29.25%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.03%

-11.24%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-7.21%

-13.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

4.10%

-0.45%

Volatility

EEMO vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) is 10.29%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that EEMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EEMOFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

11.81%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

18.42%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.99%

23.64%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

20.02%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

22.37%

-1.52%