PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMD vs. SDEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMD vs. SDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EEMD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SDEM

1D
-1.52%
1M
1.02%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.30%
1Y
30.03%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMD vs. SDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%9.61%17.60%-11.21%5.54%-0.35%12.55%-14.57%5.00%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
10.35%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%-17.40%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMD and SDEM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.70

The correlation between EEMD and SDEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMD vs. SDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMD
SDEM

Utilities

11.3%
7.9%

Energy

10.6%
5.1%

Real Estate

9.8%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
5.6%

Healthcare

9.5%
2.0%

Communication Services

9.1%
5.7%

Financial Services

9.0%
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
5.5%

Industrials

8.2%
12.9%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.2%

Technology

6.6%
5.6%

Utilities

EEMD
11.3%
SDEM
7.9%

Energy

EEMD
10.6%
SDEM
5.1%

Real Estate

EEMD
9.8%
SDEM
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

EEMD
9.7%
SDEM
5.6%

Healthcare

EEMD
9.5%
SDEM
2.0%

Communication Services

EEMD
9.1%
SDEM
5.7%

Financial Services

EEMD
9.0%
SDEM
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMD
8.8%
SDEM
5.5%

Industrials

EEMD
8.2%
SDEM
12.9%

Basic Materials

EEMD
7.4%
SDEM
1.2%

Technology

EEMD
6.6%
SDEM
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMD vs. SDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMD

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMD vs. SDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EEMD vs. SDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMDSDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

Drawdowns

EEMD vs. SDEM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMDSDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

Volatility

EEMD vs. SDEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMDSDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

EEMD vs. SDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SDEM's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMD vs. SDEM - Dividend Comparison

EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%4.03%8.41%7.66%6.34%3.84%5.35%4.91%0.42%0.00%0.00%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
5.42%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMD and SDEM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEMD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEMD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 0.00% for EEMD.

EEMD tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMD and 0.67% for SDEM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMD and SDEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer