EEMD vs. SDEM
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM).
EEMD and SDEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. SDEM is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015. Both EEMD and SDEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EEMD vs. SDEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEMD vs. SDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.61% | 17.60% | -11.21% | 5.54% | -0.35% | 12.55% | -14.57% | 5.00% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 8.90% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.64% | -21.53% | 2.11% | -11.13% | 17.56% | -17.40% | 6.09% |
Returns By Period
EEMD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDEM
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 31.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMD vs. SDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SDEM's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EEMD vs. SDEM — Risk / Return Rank
EEMD
SDEM
EEMD vs. SDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMD | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.18 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMD and SDEM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EEMD vs. SDEM - Dividend Comparison
EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% | 8.41% | 7.66% | 6.34% | 3.84% | 5.35% | 4.91% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 4.92% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
Drawdowns
EEMD vs. SDEM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMD | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -47.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.11% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -20.98% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility
EEMD vs. SDEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEMD | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.29% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.35% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.30% | — |