EEMA vs. TLT
EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMA returned 10.80%/yr vs -1.66%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. EEMA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
EEMA vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMA achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMA has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 10.80%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.66% annualized return.
EEMA
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 30.96%
- 1Y
- 56.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- -1.66%
EEMA vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 27.78% | 33.27% | 10.23% | 6.57% | -21.49% | -4.22% | 25.17% | 18.60% | -15.76% | 43.41% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMA and TLT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012 | -0.13 |
The correlation between EEMA and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMA vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
EEMA
TLT
EEMA vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.09 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 0.65 | +3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.03 | 1.63 | +13.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 0.51 | +2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | -0.40 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | -0.11 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.26 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
EEMA vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.18% | -48.35% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -7.58% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -19.18% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.67% | -43.70% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -48.35% | +4.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -40.44% | +39.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -13.82% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 3.04% | +0.75% |
Volatility
EEMA vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that EEMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 2.76% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.40% | 6.50% | +10.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 9.77% | +10.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 15.87% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 14.91% | +5.96% |
EEMA vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMA vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.16% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMA and TLT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMA has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMA dropped -44.18% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, EEMA leads with 10.80% vs -1.66% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMA has performed better with a 10.80% return vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EEMA.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.16% for EEMA.
EEMA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. EEMA tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMA and 0.15% for TLT.
EEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMA and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer