PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 9.93%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


EEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.08%
YTD
27.80%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.93%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.80%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and VTI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2003

0.75

The correlation between EEM and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
VTI

Technology

43.6%
33.5%

Financial Services

17.5%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
10.0%

Industrials

6.2%
9.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
2.0%

Communication Services

5.7%
10.3%

Energy

3.3%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.7%

Healthcare

2.5%
9.2%

Utilities

2.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.4%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
VTI
10.0%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
VTI
9.8%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
VTI
10.3%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
VTI
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
VTI
4.7%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
VTI
9.2%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
VTI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.42

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

3.17

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

14.62

+1.36

EEM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.33

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.73

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.82

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Drawdowns

EEM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-55.45%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-8.92%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-19.30%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-25.36%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-35.00%

-4.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.72%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-8.03%

-7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.93%

+1.57%

Volatility

EEM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

2.96%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

9.13%

+8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

12.17%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

17.40%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

18.30%

+2.20%

EEM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.74%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and VTI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 9.93% for EEM. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.03% for VTI.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer